Making AI Headlines · Page 8
Indie Games Argue Over Whether the Credits Need an Asterisk
· New York time
Some Independent Games Festival jurors have said they will not vote for games that use generative AI in any capacity. The developer of Big Walk separately said it used AI sparingly near the end of the game's development. Together, the statements expose a disagreement over how AI belongs in independent game production. For jurors, a broad rule offers a clear boundary: use of the technology affects whether a game receives their vote. For developers, the issue can turn on how a tool was used and how much of the finished work depended on it. Those positions do not necessarily produce the same assessment of a game. The dispute matters because independent games are often associated with small teams and distinctive creative choices. Tools that save time can be attractive, while decisions about authorship and artistic labor remain central to how a work is received. A small amount of AI use can therefore become a large point of disagreement. The festival question is not merely whether a game is enjoyable. It is also what standards jurors apply when deciding what to celebrate. Independent creators have long been encouraged to use tools that help them make something new. The argument now is over which tools change what that encouragement means.
Read this story in the full newspaper →Satire. Not factual reporting. Read the original reporting from the linked publishers.