Making Financial Headlines · Page 5
Billionaire tax seeks a majority and leaves without one
· New York time
California voters rejected Proposition 40, which would have imposed a 5% tax on the total wealth of billionaires, including assets such as shares as well as income. The result leaves the proposed levy unadopted. A wealth tax differs from a tax on income because it concerns the value of assets held, not simply money earned during a year. That makes the design of a proposal central to the debate. Shares and other holdings can change in value, while a tax obligation requires a more immediate calculation. The measure aimed at a very small group but was decided by the broader electorate. Voters who would not personally pay the proposed tax still had a say in whether California should adopt it. The result is a decision on the proposition, not an accounting of the finances of any particular billionaire. The proposal put a narrow membership requirement on a statewide ballot. Its supporters needed a broad coalition to approve a charge that would have applied to a select few. Voters declined to create the new category, leaving the policy question open for further argument and the proposed form without anyone required to fill it out.
Read this story in the full newspaper →Satire. Not factual reporting. Read the original reporting from the linked publishers.